Those for whom English is a second language may prefer to answer surveys in the language they are most comfortable with. This ensures they understand the questions, which leads to better quality data. Translation is also important because it helps make survey data collection inclusive and representative of the youth being surveyed.

This user guide provides information on logging into the dashboard, accessing your data, using filters, and exporting data in reports.

This brief explores how APS programming might be tailored to meet the needs of pregnant and parenting youth participating in PREP. First, it discusses the precursors and outcomes that programs might target in their APS programming with pregnant and parenting youth. Recommendations follow on the relevant topics, by APS. The brief concludes by discussing specific program design and implementation considerations presented across the APS conceptual models that are relevant to pregnant and parenting youth, including teaching strategies and implementation considerations related to staffing and partnerships.

This document provides an overview of the individual-level data submission change and addresses related questions from grantees.

The document provides the general timeline for collection and biannual submission of the PREP performance measures.

This summary document provides an overview of the performance measures, the levels of data collection, and guidelines around data collection and submission. 

Guidelines for youth participant survey administration.

This is a transcript of the video Overview of PREP Performance Measures. 

Welcome to the overview of PREP performance measures. These measures are designed to be a powerful tool. They help demonstrate grantee’s program successes, help ACF understand the progress and implementation of PREP programs, and they can support grantees in continuous quality improvement efforts (CQI). Measures are broken down into three categories: 

1) Structure, Cost, and Support for Implementation (the nuts and bolts of program administration), 

2) Attendance, Reach, and Dosage (how many youth were reached, and how much programming was received), and

3) Participants’ Characteristics, Behaviors, Program Experiences, and Perceptions of Program Effects (which are collected through participant entrance and exit surveys). 

Bets practices and recommendations for working with your program's Institutional Review Board (IRB)

FAQ document that covers frequently asked questions about online data collection, with updates that reflect the system changes in 2024

Complete definitions of the performance measures of attendance, reach, and dosage.

Complete definitions of the performance measures of structure, cost, and implementation support.

This letter provides an overview of performance measures to program partner who may be collecting data on grantee's behalf.